閆 靜 劉洋洋

（山東大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院，山東濟(jì)南，250100）

  摘 要：作為記錄社會(huì)發(fā)展的一種原始性記憶符號(hào)或敘事媒介，檔案對(duì)身份認(rèn)同的作用機(jī)制呈現(xiàn)出一體兩面的趨勢(shì)：一是通過(guò)記憶建構(gòu)，維系與重建身份認(rèn)同；二是通過(guò)記憶消解，抹去與隱藏個(gè)體差異。而檔案對(duì)身份認(rèn)同的作用機(jī)制又與記憶和遺忘相伴相生，即檔案選擇性記憶以建構(gòu)身份認(rèn)同，同時(shí)選擇性遺忘以消解身份認(rèn)同。如今，身份認(rèn)同話語(yǔ)從權(quán)力神壇轉(zhuǎn)向更廣泛的個(gè)體語(yǔ)境，這對(duì)檔案事業(yè)提出了新訴求，即構(gòu)建一個(gè)全景的檔案世界，尊重個(gè)性、包容差異。

  關(guān)鍵詞：檔案價(jià)值；身份認(rèn)同；記憶；遺忘；選擇性機(jī)制

  分類號(hào)：G270

Identity Paradox in Archives ：

the Functional and Internal Mechanism of Archives to Identity

Yan Jing，Liu Yangyang

(School of History and Culture of Shandong University, Ji’nan, Shandong, 250100)

      Abstract : As a primitive memory symbol or narrative medium to record the social development,the functional mechanism of archives to identity presents a trend of two sides, one is to construct,maintain and reconstruct identity through memory, the other is to eliminate, erase and hide individual

difference through memory. The functional mechanism of archives to identity is accompanied by memory and oblivion, through remembering or forgetting selectively to construct or to dispel identity.Nowadays, identity discourse has changed from a power shrine to a broader context of individuality,which puts forward a new demand of building a panoramic archival world, respecting for individuality and admitting various differences for the archival undertaking.

      Keywords: Archival value;Identity;Memory;Oblivion;Selective Mechanism

  *本文系2019年度國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“后現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)境中的檔案與身份認(rèn)同研究”（項(xiàng)目編號(hào)：19CTQ034）階段性研究成果

  發(fā)表于《檔案與建設(shè)》2021年第3期